Myths around ‘benefit dependency’

Cover of the Labour Market in WinterWhen Beveridge set out his plan for the British welfare state in 1942, ‘idleness’ was one of the five giants that he aimed to slay (along with want, disease, ignorance and squalor).  Somewhere since then, this has been translated into ‘benefit dependency’ – not quite the same thing, as lone mothers and carers can hardly be called idle.  Still, publics and policymakers are concerned about ‘benefit dependency’ as a social ill, so I was a struck by an international comparison of benefit dependency from the launch of the high-profile new book, The Labour Market in Winter.

The book launch took place earlier this month and was sufficiently important for the Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls to attend. The chart that caught my eye is this one:

Comparison of levels of welfare receipt internationally

[You can find this in the slides , and I’d guess also in the book (which I’ve now bought), although I haven’t reached this chapter yet)]

The most interesting point is in Paul Gregg’s message above the slide  – the US and UK are surprisingly similar in their levels of welfare receipt, and this is noticeably less than the levels in most European OECD  countries. At least in the UK, public opinion seems to think that the UK has unusually high welfare receipt, with the US in particular being much lower – so these results should come as something of a surprise.

It’s also clear that the composition of welfare receipt is different in different countries – incapacity benefits being much more important in Sweden than Germany, for example.  Given the substitutability between different types of welfare payments, this means that comparisons of any single type of benefit (without any context) are likely to be somewhat misleading. And clearly Spain is a outlier in this company, although this is probably less true when other countries are added to the comparison.

Just one graph, then, which raises as many questions as it answers. But a graph that shows that ‘benefit dependency’ is not the widely-supposed failure of the British policy elite, but a phenomenon we can find across high-income countries at the start of the 21st century.

About Ben Baumberg

I am currently a Lecturer in Sociology and Social Policy at the School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research (SSPSSR) at the University of Kent. I also helped set up the collaborative research blog Inequalities, where I regularly write articles and short blog posts. I have a wide range of (too many...) research interests, at the moment focusing on disability, the workplace, inequality, deservingness and the future of the benefits system, and the relationship between evidence and policy. You can find out more about me at http://www.benbaumberg.com
This entry was posted in Blog posts and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Myths around ‘benefit dependency’

  1. Pingback: Paul Gregg: new ideas for disability, employment and welfare reform | Inequalities

  2. Pingback: New estimates for disability benefit spending from the OBR - Rethinking Incapacity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s